Get A Quote
When it comes to manufacturing high-quality plastic products, two processes often come to mind-injection molding and rotational molding. Both methods are widely used across industries, yet they differ greatly in terms of process, cost, and application. For companies aiming to balance production efficiency and cost-effectiveness, understanding these differences is key. So, which one is more economical for your project — injection molding or rotational molding? Let’s break it down in detail.
Rotational molding, also known as plastic rotomolding, is a manufacturing process used to create hollow, seamless plastic parts. It involves heating a mold filled with powdered plastic resin while it slowly rotates on multiple axes. The resin melts and evenly coats the mold’s interior, forming a uniform layer.
Unlike other molding methods, rotational molding doesn’t require high pressure or expensive tooling. This makes it a preferred choice for large, hollow, or custom-shaped products, such as tanks, containers, playground equipment, and kayaks.
A rotational molding machine typically features a central turret with multiple arms, each carrying molds that move through heating, cooling, and loading/unloading stations. The process ensures consistency and precision in every product cycle.
One advanced example of such technology is the Benfan Carousel Rotomolding Machine, known for its continuous production and high stability. With three moving trolleys and options for 4 or 5 stations, it allows heating, cooling, and demolding to happen simultaneously — boosting efficiency and output while maintaining product quality.
Injection molding involves injecting molten plastic into a metal mold under high pressure. Once cooled, the part is ejected, and the process repeats. It’s ideal for mass-producing small, precise components, such as caps, containers, and technical parts.
Injection molding delivers excellent dimensional accuracy and surface finish. However, it often requires costly molds and high pressure equipment, making it less economical for low-volume production or large, hollow parts.
When it comes to tooling investment, rotational molding is significantly more cost-effective. The molds used in plastic rotomolding are typically made from aluminum or steel but do not need to withstand high pressure. This means lower tooling costs, faster setup, and easier modification.
In contrast, injection molding demands precision-machined steel molds that can handle extreme pressure and temperature. The tooling alone can cost tens of thousands of dollars, making it practical only for high-volume production.
Winner: Rotational molding — Lower upfront cost and easier customization.
Injection molding excels in high-volume production. Once the expensive mold is made, the process is incredibly fast, capable of producing thousands of identical parts per day.
Meanwhile, rotational molding has a longer cycle time since the resin must be heated and cooled slowly while the mold rotates. However, innovations like Benfan’s Carousel Rotational Molding Machine have improved cycle efficiency by running multiple molds simultaneously, enhancing output for medium to large-scale production.
Winner: Injection molding for mass production; rotational molding for flexible medium-scale runs.
Rotational molding is remarkably efficient in material use. Because the process operates without high pressure, there’s minimal material waste. Any excess resin can be reused in future cycles, contributing to a more sustainable production approach.
On the other hand, injection molding often produces runners, sprues, and other waste materials that may not always be recyclable depending on the resin type.
Winner: Rotational molding — Eco-friendly and low-waste process.
When it comes to complex geometries, seamless designs, and hollow parts, plastic rotomolding stands out. It allows for consistent wall thickness, integrated inserts, and double-walled products — all without the risk of seams or weak spots.
Injection molding offers precision and tight tolerances but struggles with very large or hollow parts. Adjustments to mold design are also more time-consuming and costly.
Winner: Rotational molding — Excellent design flexibility and customization options.
Injection molding produces parts with smooth finishes and fine details, perfect for consumer goods that require an aesthetic surface. Rotational molding, while versatile, generally yields a slightly textured or matte surface finish, though this can be enhanced through mold design or post-processing.
Winner: Injection molding — Superior surface detail and finish.
If your project involves large or hollow plastic components, rotational molding is the undisputed choice. It’s commonly used for making storage tanks, bins, toys, and outdoor furniture. Injection molding shines in smaller, precision-based items like gears, fittings, and enclosures.
Winner: Depends on the product size and purpose. For large, hollow, or durable parts — rotational molding is more economical and practical.
When evaluating injection molding vs rotational molding, the total cost depends on several factors-tooling, materials, production volume and labor.
| Factor | Injection Molding | Rotational Molding |
| Tooling Cost | High | Low |
| Cycle Time | Fast | Moderate |
| Volume Suitability | High volume | Small to medium |
| Product Size | Small | Large |
| Customization | Limited | High |
| Waste | Moderate | Minimal |
| Overall Cost Efficiency | High for mass production | High for customized or large parts |
If your production involves low-to-medium volumes or large, complex parts, rotational molding is far more economical. You’ll save on tooling, reduce waste, and gain greater flexibility in design changes. However, if you’re manufacturing small parts in millions, injection molding’s rapid cycle time can offset its higher upfront cost over time.
The rise of modern rotational molding machines is revolutionizing how manufacturers think about plastic production. Automated control systems, energy-efficient heating, and modular stations make plastic rotomolding more competitive than ever.
The Benfan Carousel Rotational Molding Machine is a great example. Designed for continuous, high-volume production, it features a central turret and three moving arms that handle heating, cooling, and demolding simultaneously. This setup significantly boosts productivity while maintaining uniform wall thickness and material integrity — an ideal solution for industries aiming for cost efficiency and consistent quality.
Yes — especially for low- to medium-volume runs and large, hollow parts. The molds are less expensive, and the rotational molding process doesn’t require high-pressure equipment.
Not exactly. Injection molding offers tighter tolerances, but rotational molding delivers excellent uniformity and structural strength for large parts, without seams or weak points.
Plastic rotomolding creates stress-free parts with even wall thickness, making them extremely durable and impact-resistant, ideal for outdoor and industrial use.
Absolutely. Rotational molding is perfect for custom shapes, double-walled designs, and intricate geometries that would be too costly or complex with injection molding.
When evaluating which is more economical: injection molding or rotational molding, the answer depends on your production goals. If you prioritize high volume and precision, injection molding might be your go-to. But if your focus is versatility, large part production, and cost control, rotational molding clearly comes out ahead.
With modern advancements like Benfan’s Carousel Rotational Molding Machine, manufacturers can achieve higher efficiency, reduced cycle times, and excellent consistency — all while keeping production costs in check.
For businesses looking to scale with flexible, durable, and economical plastic rotomolding solutions, investing in a high-quality rotational molding machine is the smartest move toward sustainable growth. Explore the full specifications of the Benfan Carousel Rotomolding Machine — your trusted partner for efficient, reliable, and cost-effective rotational molding production.
If you want to learn more about the two ways, you can read: Rotational Molding vs. Injection Molding.